Man Woman Ethno
Man Woman Ethno
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Man Woman Ethno Forum Index -> All about Man
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dr. Lippschitz
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:45 am    Post subject: THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS Reply with quote

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/09/jews-must-live-by-samuel-roth.html



Chapter II

THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS



The scrolls unroll before me. "In the beginning God created the heavens and
the earth. And the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was on the face
of the deep." The very first words I ever read. They are still the most
beautiful words I know. Baaraishes buroo Elohim as kashamayimm vehu-uretz.
Vehu-urtez hoysu sehoi uvohoi, vechoischach aal penai tekoim." That is how
the words actually sounded. I read on through the unfolding scrolls, from
the first word to the last, and the ancient wonder stirs into music for me
again. Good, deep, true lovely old book. It tells a straightforward honest
story. None of the illusions, following which I almost broke my neck, are
here. Only the rabbis lied to me.

The first time I heard the words, of the poet-author of Genesis it was from
the mouth of my father, and I revered him as if he were himself their
author. My father's father was a great man in the country in which I was
born: I heard him recite Hebrew words one Yom Kippur night, and he wavered
like a great god with wings between the two tall taper lights on each side
of the Ark of the Cove­nant. My father had three brothers, each as tall and
as stalwart as himself: occasionally Hebrew words would emanate from them,
and they appeared to grow into godhood in front of my eyes. They are all
dead now except one. I realized long before they died that they were not
gods. My father's father, his father before him, and all the Jewish fathers
yielding all the way back to Abraham the father of them all - they were all
Jews, far, far from gods.

No one knew this better than that wise poet-author of Genesis­ -- now that I
have learned how to read him correctly. "And there was a famine in the
land," he relates, "and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there: for the
famine was sore in the land. And it came to pass when he was come near to
enter into Egypt that he said unto Sarai, his wife: Behold now, I know that
thou art a fair woman to look upon. And it will come to pass when the
Egyptians will see thee, that they will say: 'This is his wife,' and they
will kill me, but thee they will keep alive. Say, I pray thee, thou art my
sister; that it may be well with me for thy sake, and that my soul may live
because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt,
the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. And the princes of
Pharaoh saw her, and praised her to Pharaoh; and the woman was taken into
Pharaoh's house. And he dealt well with Abram for her sake; and he had
sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and men-servants and maid-servants, and
she-asses and camels. And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great
plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. And Pharaoh called Abram and said:
'What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why didst thou not tell me that
she was thy wife? Why saidst thou; She is my sister? so that I took her to
be my wife; now therefor behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way! And
Pharaoh gave men charge concerning him; and they brought him on the way, and
his wife, and all that they had. And Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and
his wife and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the South. And Abram
was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold." [3]

Apparently these words describe one of the very early stages in the career
of this nomad chieftain to whom the blood of our race rolls back. By the
evidence of the little (practically nothing outside of his wife's beauty) he
brought along with him to Egypt, Abraham was rich only in his dreams of the
future. Else - supposing, as we have no right to, that he had a strength
such as is not represented by worldly goods - why should he have been afraid
of Pharaoh? But there can be no misunderstanding the nature of this little
jaunt of Abraham's. It was only one of several such raids told with cyni­cal
politeness as to detail by the author of Genesis. There probably were more
raids which it was pointless to record. One thing is certain: those visits
were not motivated by friendliness. According to the most reliable
historians of that period the nomads wandered through many countries,
sometimes by pre-arrangement with those countries, but more frequently in
the spirit of sheer invasion. The historian of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica
says: "In times of draught and food-shortage such nomads as these . . . were
compelled to raid their agricultural, settled neighbors." But in that first
recorded trip to Egypt, Abraham, of whom the ancient historian Nicolaus of
Damascus wrote that he "came with an army out of the land above Babylon" and
"reigned at Damascus," was not yet strong enough to enrich himself by
violence. There are, however, more ways than one of making conquest. The one
chosen by Abraham, and resulting in his being laden by Pharaoh with presents
for the favors of his beautiful wife, has become a very popular occupation.
Apparently, also, few of the tricks in the game as it is played today were
unknown to Abraham. How else are we to understand these words in Genesis:
"The Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai
Abram's wife." I cannot accept the popular anti-Semitic interpretation that
Abraham and his wife suffered of a venereal disease. On the contrary I do
not think anything physical is implied here at all. Whenever he means to
convey the idea of a physical ailment the poet of Genesis is always at great
pains to name it. Here he merely says that the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his
house. Is it too rash to assume that this plague sounds a little more like
blackmail than syphilis? Or why, if this is not true, is the poet at pains
to explain that when Abraham returned with his family out of Egypt he "was
very rich in cattle, in silver and in gold."

That Abraham, having discovered this new racket, decided to practice it
further, becomes apparent when he repeats the adventure in a similar manner
before the king of another people. "And Abraham journeyed from thence toward
the land of the South and dwelt between Kadesh and Gerar. And Abraham said
of Sarah and his wife: 'She is my sister. [4] And Abimelech King of Gerar
sent, and took Sarah. But God came to Abimelech in a dream of the night, and
said to him: 'Behold, thou shalt die, because of the woman that thou hast
taken; for she is a man's wife! Now Abimelech had not come near her; and he
said: 'Lord, wilt thou slay even a righteous nation? Said he not himself
unto me: she is my sister? and she, even herself said: He is my brother. In
the simplicity of my heart and the innocency of my hands have I done this!
And God said unto him in the dream: 'Yea, I know that in the simplicity of
thy heart hast thou done this, and also witheld thee from sinning against
Me. Therefore suffered I thee not to touch her. Now therefore restore the
man's wife; for he is a prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt
live; and if thou restore her not, know that thou shalt surely die, thou,
and all that are thine.' And Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called
all his servants, and told them all these things in their ears; and the men
were sore afraid. Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him: 'What
hast thou done unto us? and wherein have I sinned against thee, that thou
hast brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds unto
me that ought not to be done! And Abimelech said unto Abraham: 'What sawest
thou that thou hast done this thing?' And Abraham said: 'Because I thought:
Surely the fear of God is not in this place: and they will slay me for my
wife's sake. And moreover, she is indeed my sister, the daughter of my
father, but not the daughter of my mother; and so she became my wife. And it
came to pass when God caused me to wander from my father's house, that I
said unto her: 'This is thy kindness which thou shalt show unto me; at every
place whither we shall come, say of me: he is my brother.' And Abimelech
took sheep, and oxen, and men-servants and women-servants, and gave them
unto Abraham, and restored him Sarah his wife. And Abimelech said: 'Behold,
my land is before thee: dwell where it pleaseth thee! And unto Sarah he
said: 'Behold I have given thy brother a thousand pieces of silver; behold,
it is for thee a covering of the eyes [5] to all who are with thee; and
before all men thou art righted.' "

Abraham became a really rich man. There was too much for him to lose now if
having tried this little game, it should happen to fail. Besides, having had
the greater means, there were other grander schemes to work. The story of
Abraham becomes elo­quent with intrigues and alliances between himself and
other desert bandits and - God. He solemnly announces his allegiance to a
new Deity, and, probably to economize on the expensive materials which went
into the making of idols, and to save himself the trouble of having to cart
them about with him in the desert, he invented God's in-corporeality. This
carried him far into the esteem of his gaping contemporaries. Only one thing
seemed to trouble him: the lack of a son to inherit the spoils and found a
new nation in his name, as he had promised himself in his dreams. Genesis
reports that Abraham was not really very particular. Finding himself too old
to beget children of his own, Abraham was quite content to let Ishmael, a
son by his wife's servant Hagar, to be his heir. If the passion of the
narrative here is to be trusted, Abraham was more than ordin­arily fond of
Ishmael. But Sarah had never forgiven Hagar for laugh­ing at her, and as
she hated Hagar she loathed Hagar's offspring. No, under no circumstances
was that obnoxious handmaiden of hers to fall heir to the name and riches of
Abraham. Rather, since Abraham was too old for the hope of a child by him,
would it be a son of her own by the seed of another man which might fructify
within her [6]. Nothing is clearer in the book of Genesis than that Sarah
was a shrew, and that Abraham was a henpecked husband.

The stream of the narrative in Genesis is often turbulent and unclear
because it is really two narratives blended into one, with spots where the
process of blending was not so successfully accomplished. But the unfolding
of the strange circumstances leading to the birth of Isaac is not the result
of this difficulty. It must have been told quite honestly by the author (or
authors) of Genesis; but it was ob­viously tampered with by those Hebrew
scholars in Alexandria who committed most of the mischief in Biblical
exegesis. Here is the passage as it is given to us today:

"And the Lord appeared unto him (Abraham) by the terebinths of Mamre, as he
sat in the text door in the heat of the day; and he lifted his eyes and
looked, and lo, three men stood over against him; and when he saw them, he
ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed down to the earth, and said:
'My LORD, if now I have found favor in thy sight, pass not away, I pray
thee, from thy servant. Let now a little water be fetched, and wash your
feet and recline yourself under the tree. And I will fetch a morsel of
bread, and stay ye your heart; after that ye shall pass on; forasmuch as ye
are come to your servant.' And they said: 'So do as thou hast said.' And
Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said: 'Make ready quickly
three measures of fine meal, knead it and make cakes! And Abraham ran unto
the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it unto the servant;
and he hastened to dress it. And he took curd, and milk, and the calf which
he had dressed, and set it before them and he stood by them under the tree,
and they did eat. And they said unto him: 'Where is Sarah thy wife?' And he
said: 'Behold, in the tent,' And he said: 'I will certainly return to thee
when the season cometh round; and lo, Sarah thy wife, shall have a son! And
Sarah heard in the tent door, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah
were old, and well stricken in age; it had ceased to be with Sarah after the
manner of women. And Sarah laughed within herself, saying: 'After I have
waxed old shall I have pleasure [7] my lord being old also?' And the Lord
said unto Abraham: 'Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying: Shall I of a surety
bear a child, who am old? Is anything too hard for the Lord? At the set time
I will return unto thee ' when the, season cometh round, and Sarah shall
have a son! Then Sarah denied, saying: 'I laughed not,' for she was afraid.
And He said: 'Nay but thou didst laugh!"

Until the very last bantering words it is wildly possible that a story as
gravely beautiful, as poetically sincere as Genesis might have confused
humanity and divinity so badly. But would even the most rabid apologist for
Abraham and our national pride insist that the Lord carried on such petty
and utterly useless banter with the woman Sarah?

Notice that three people appear before Abraham. Three people are fed by him,
and fed "to stay the heart," an expression that would never have occurred to
the original author if he tried to convey the impression that Abraham knew
he was entertaining the Lord himself. But Abraham, you will notice, carries
on his conversation with only one. The expurgators of the Bible who here did
their best to veil the clear sense of the narrative, would have you believe
that the trio consisted of God and two of his angels. Nothing concerning
their nature is said or hinted in the first part of the narrative here
quoted. But in the next part, when, their leader having remained behind to
converse with Abraham, the two are described entering the city of Sodom, the
Alexandria meddlers seem to have made up their minds, and those who are
described as men in Chapter 18 are definitely referred to as angels in
Chapter 19. This inconsistency is made plausible by the fact that the Hebrew
word maluchim means both angels and messengers.

Now to any intelligent unprejudiced reader it should become obvious from the
fact that Abraham greets three visitors and holds conversation with only
one, that the one was some important local chieftain, on his way to
prosecute an important business and that the two who accompanied him were
his bodyguards. To prove that these two were servants and not angels, it is
only necessary to prove that their master was a man, and not God. The Hebrew
text, so inexpertly tampered with, proves this conclusively. The word Lord
is written in two ways in Hebrew. When intended to denote the Deity it is
spelled Yahwah, and pronounced Adenoi. But when the word is intended to
denote a human master the word Adenoi is spelled as it is pronounced. In
that part of the narrative where I reproduced the word LORD in capitals, the
expurgators of Genesis - who faltered so frequently in their
mystifications - spelled the word Adenoi, as appertaining to a man.

Instead of being, what it has been made to appear, a meeting between Abraham
and God, the incident is merely that of a meeting between Abraham and one of
his more powerful neighbor chieftains. His message to Abraham is in effect:
Obviously, Abraham, you are not a man to trifle with. One capable of
inventing your particular monstrosity of a god, should be consulted on all
important desert matters. Well, I don't like the behavior of the people in
Sodom. I understand the lovemaking of man and woman because it is sweet and
fruitful. But what comes of the love of man and man and woman and woman?
Certainly nothing that can be seen by the naked eye. And what a terrible
example for our children. And what of the future of the race? Their
destruction which is certain should be hastened. Towards that end I have
sent my messengers ahead for a view of their fortifications. Then we'll
knock hell out of them. So much for our moral chieftain's message. He began
by accepting Abraham's hospitality, and, with the insolence of the just,
ended by proposing to provide him with an heir.[8] It is to be presumed from
the context that the beauty of Sarah was as well known as Abraham's
unfortu­nate lack of an heir; so that when this chieftain saw the aged
desert beauty winking at him from behind the doorway it was only natural for
him to become licentiously interested.

But are you not going a bit too far from the accepted reading of the story,
I can hear the reader ask. In proof of my belief that the incident as I
quote it from the Old Testament has been tampered with [9], and that the
story is really as I am setting it forth, I offer the corroboration of Philo
Judaeaus, the greatest Hebrew scholar of all time. Philo, who lived about 10
B.C., must have had available the unaltered text of Genesis [10]. Here is
his version of the matter:

"And when those persons, having been entertained in his house, address their
entertainer in an affectionate manner, it is again one of them who promises
that he will himself be present, and will bestow on him a seed of a child of
his own, speaking in the following words: 'I will return again and visit
thee again, according to the time of life, and Sarah thy wife shall have a
son.' "

Apparently the Old Testament's tamperers cut down his lordship's proposed
two visits to one, for it is only too obvious from the original, as quoted
by Philo, that the first visit, "according to the time of life" was for the
sowing of the seed, and the second, that he might see the seed in flower.

But Abraham lived to bitterly regret this bargain. The account Genesis gives
us of Isaac, his indolence, his lack of pride and venturesomeness, makes
him, a pale ragged figure beside that of the flaming Ishmael. The more
Abraham looked at Isaac, the son of a stranger by his wife, the more he
loved Ishmael, sprung from his own loins. He grew to hate Isaac with a
terrible hatred, and it seems altogether likely to me that Abraham would
have thought of the sacrifice of Isaac even without divine intervention.

If Isaac died, Abraham decided, he would never again let Sarah inveigle him
into such an arrangement. And, whether Sarah liked it or not, Ishmael would
inherit everything. If my suggestion that Abraham really took Isaac into the
wilderness, when Sarah happened not to be aware, with the object of
murdering him, is not true, why was Abraham so secretive about his
operations! It could not be that he was performing a religious rite. All
other religious rites Abraham performed within sight of all his family and
servants.

The carelessness of our Hebrew fathers with regard to the chastity of their
wives passes on in the same deliberate tradition, to Isaac. When, like his
father, Isaac fell upon evil days, he wandered out with his family into the
land of the Philistines, the people ruled by Abimelech whose affair with
Isaac's mother had been so costly to the tribal treasury. "And," records
Genesis, "Isaac dwelt in Gerar. And the men of the place asked him of his
wife; and he said: 'She is my sister;' for he feared to say: 'My wife, lest
the men of the place should kill me for Rebekah, because she is fair to look
upon.' And it came to pass when he had been there a long time, that
Abim­elech king of the Philistines looked out at a window, and saw, and,
behold, Isaac was sporting with Rebekah his wife. And Abimelech called Isaac
and said: "Behold of a surety she is thy wife, and how saidst thou: she is
my sister?" And Isaac said unto him: 'Because I said: Lest I die because of
her.' And Abimelech said: 'What is this thou hast done unto us? One of the
people might easily have lain with thy wife, [11] and thou wouldst have
brought guiltiness upon us.' And Abimelech charged all the people saying:
'He that toucheth this man or his wife shall surely be put to death.' And
Isaac sowed in that land, and found in the same year a hundredfold; and the
Lord blessed him. And the man waxed great, and grew more and more until he
grew very great. And he had possessions of flocks, and possessions of herds,
and a great household; and the Philistines envied him."

It must have been this propensity to trade the favors of their women for
gold that caused the Jews to be held in such abhorrence by the ancient
world. How deep-stung was this hatred of Jews in olden times is testified to
eloquently by the author of Genesis in his description of the feast set by
Joseph for his brethren: "And Joseph made haste; for his heart yearned
towards his brother; and he sought where to weep; and he entered into his
chamber and he wept there. And he washed his face, and came out; and he
refrained himself, and said: 'Set on bread.' And they set on for him by
himself, and for them by themselves; because the Egyptians might not eat
bread with the Hebrews; for that is an abomination for the Egyptians."

That is all. The subject matter is never again broached either in Genesis or
in the rest of the Old Testament. Why did not the author of Genesis, who had
such a deep respect for Egypt, make some effort to explain Egypt's contempt
for the Jews? He might at least have tried to explain why the Egyptians at
that table, all inferior to Joseph in rank, would have felt it an
abomination to eat with him? His complete indifference to the matter is a
more terrible accusation against the Jews than any to be found in the works
of Livy and Apion. But might there not have been some explanation which was
torn out of its context by the great expurgators?

The portrait of the third of the great founders of our blood is done in even
more lurid colors. Jacob - did not stop after stealing his brother Esau's
birthright: "And it came to pass," runs the story, "that when Isaac was old,
and his eyes were dim, so that he could not see, he called Esau his elder
son, and said unto him: 'My son;' and he said unto him: 'Here am I' And he
said: 'Behold, now, I am old, I know not the day of my death. Now therefore
take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the
field, and take me venison; and make me savory food, such as I love, and
bring it to me, that I may eat; that my soul may bless me before I die.' And
Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And Esau went to the field
to hunt for venison, and to bring it. And Rebekah spoke unto Jacob her son,
saying: 'behold, I heard thy father speak unto Esau thy brother, saying:
Bring me venison, and make me savory food, that I may eat, and bless thee
before the Lord before my death. Now therefore, my son, hearken to my voice
according to that which I command thee. Go now to the flock, and fetch me
from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savory food for
thy father, that he may eat, so that he may bless thee before his death.'
And Jacob said to Rebekah his mother: 'Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy
man, and I am a smooth man. My father peradventure will feel me, and I shall
seem to him, as a mocker; and I shall bring a curse upon me and not a
blessing.' And his mother said unto him: 'Upon me be thy curse, my son only
hearken to my voice, and go fetch me them.' And he went, and fetched, and
brought them to his mother; and his mother made savory food, such as his
father loved. And Rebekah took the choicest garments of Esau her eldest son,
which were with her in the house, and put them upon Jacob the young­er son.
And she put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands, and upon the
smooth of his neck. And she gave the savory food and the bread, which she
had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob. And he came unto his father
and said 'My father;' and he said: 'Here am I; who art thou, my son?' And
Jacob said unto his father: 'I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according
as thou hast badest me. Arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that
thy soul may bless me. 'And Isaac said unto his son: 'How is it that thou
hast found it so quickly, my son?' And he said: 'Because the Lord thy God
sent me good speed! And Isaac said unto Jacob: 'Come near I pray thee, that
I may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very son Esau or not.' And Jacob
went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt him, and said: 'The voice is
the voice of Jacob but the hands are the hands of Esau.' And he discerned
him not because his hands were hairy, as his brother Esau's hands, so he
blessed him. . . And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of
blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac
his father, that Esau his brother came in from the hunting. And he also made
savory food, and brought it unto his father; and he said unto his father:
'Let my father arise and eat of his son's venison, that thy soul may bless
me.' And Isaac his father said unto him: 'Who art thou? And he said: 'I am
thy son, thy firstborn Esau! And Isaac trembled very exceedingly, and said:
'Who, then, is he that hath taken venison, and brought it me, and I have
eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? Yea, and he shall be
blessed! When Esau heard the words of his father he cried with an exceeding
great and bitter cry. . .' "

When the children, in the old little synagogue where I learnt my Hebrew
letters, came to this portion of the Law, the rabbi would add: "And the cry
which Esau uttered was so terrible that the fiery Gehannah itself opened
before him." The rabbi must have added this to frighten us, to give us an
inkling of what a monster out of Hell the man Esau was, so as to make us
loathe the hairy man. Instead, a thrill of sympathy shot through me for the
cheated Esau. In my heart, I must have loved him more than I loved Jacob.

Only one thing relieves the portrait of Jacob, this man of monstrous cunning
and endless guile: his love for Rachel. The appearance of Rachel introduces
a new element into the story of the Hebrew race. Unlike the wives of Abraham
and Isaac, shrews of the shrillest order, Rachel was beautiful and gentle.
One can almost see her softening influence on the character of her husband
who combined business subtlety with a fierce determination to rise even
above the birthright he had purchased. The delicate fingers of Rachel soften
some of the hard lines in the portrait of Jacob.

Top




[3] All Biblical quotations in this book are from the Jewish Publication
Society translation, accepted by the Jews as the most faithful to the
original Hebrew, obtainable in English.

[4] Even the bare pretense that this is done for fear of his life is
abandoned in the telling of the second adventure.

[5] 'Covering of the eyes' the oriental expression for 'hush-money.'

[6] A barren woman is a firm believer in her husband's barrenness.

[7] The issue is whether Abraham shall have an heir. But notice what the old
bitch is thinking about.

[8] The reader might object that Abraham could hardly believe that a son
would be his, if he were born of another man's seed. A modern Abraham might
not. But the ancient Hebrews had a peculiar attitude in such matters. I
refer you to verse 6, chapter 38 of Genesis: "And Judah took a wife for Er
his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. And Er Judah's firstborn, was wicked
in the sight of the Lord: and the Lord slew him. And Judah said unto Onan:
'Go in unto thy brother's wife, and perform the duty of a husband's brother
unto her, and raise up seed unto thy brother."' But how, it may be asked,
could the chieftain so glibly promise that the issue would be a boy, and not
a girl? The Arabians had a conceit about such matters, and thought they knew
by position in love how to predetermine the sex of a child. Besides, an
enamored man tries to be not accurate but persuasive.

[9] The prevailing edition of Genesis has the Lord saying to Abraham that
his seed would be a stranger in a land not theirs and be afflicted for 400
years. In the version of Genesis available to Philo, the text read 40 years.
Here, too, you see the hand of the expurgator attempting to connect this
prophesy with the Jews' eventual sojourn in Egypt.

[10] A similar accusation is made in the Koran. Several instances of vital
falsification are cited. But the Koran is a very poor critic of almost
everything else; and so I hesitate to cite it even where it is correct.

[11] What a compliment this is to Rebekah's virtue!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


TheZ
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:38 am    Post subject: Re: THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS Reply with quote

I guess your father couldn't read Hebrew.

"Dr. Lippschitz" <lippschitz@skool.uni> wrote in message
news:SjNfk.28$0p1.12@trndny08...
Quote:
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/09/jews-must-live-by-samuel-roth.html



Chapter II

THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS



The scrolls unroll before me. "In the beginning God created the heavens
and the earth. And the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was on
the face of the deep." The very first words I ever read. They are still
the most beautiful words I know. Baaraishes buroo Elohim as kashamayimm
vehu-uretz. Vehu-urtez hoysu sehoi uvohoi, vechoischach aal penai tekoim."
That is how the words actually sounded. I read on through the unfolding
scrolls, from the first word to the last, and the ancient wonder stirs
into music for me again. Good, deep, true lovely old book. It tells a
straightforward honest story. None of the illusions, following which I
almost broke my neck, are here. Only the rabbis lied to me.

The first time I heard the words, of the poet-author of Genesis it was
from the mouth of my father, and I revered him as if he were himself their
author. My father's father was a great man in the country in which I was
born: I heard him recite Hebrew words one Yom Kippur night, and he wavered
like a great god with wings between the two tall taper lights on each side
of the Ark of the Cove­nant. My father had three brothers, each as tall
and as stalwart as himself: occasionally Hebrew words would emanate from
them, and they appeared to grow into godhood in front of my eyes. They are
all dead now except one. I realized long before they died that they were
not gods. My father's father, his father before him, and all the Jewish
fathers yielding all the way back to Abraham the father of them all - they
were all Jews, far, far from gods.

No one knew this better than that wise poet-author of Genesis­ -- now that
I have learned how to read him correctly. "And there was a famine in the
land," he relates, "and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there: for
the famine was sore in the land. And it came to pass when he was come near
to enter into Egypt that he said unto Sarai, his wife: Behold now, I know
that thou art a fair woman to look upon. And it will come to pass when the
Egyptians will see thee, that they will say: 'This is his wife,' and they
will kill me, but thee they will keep alive. Say, I pray thee, thou art my
sister; that it may be well with me for thy sake, and that my soul may
live because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into
Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. And the
princes of Pharaoh saw her, and praised her to Pharaoh; and the woman was
taken into Pharaoh's house. And he dealt well with Abram for her sake; and
he had sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and men-servants and maid-servants,
and she-asses and camels. And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with
great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. And Pharaoh called Abram and
said: 'What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why didst thou not tell
me that she was thy wife? Why saidst thou; She is my sister? so that I
took her to be my wife; now therefor behold thy wife, take her, and go thy
way! And Pharaoh gave men charge concerning him; and they brought him on
the way, and his wife, and all that they had. And Abram went up out of
Egypt, he, and his wife and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the
South. And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold." [3]

Apparently these words describe one of the very early stages in the career
of this nomad chieftain to whom the blood of our race rolls back. By the
evidence of the little (practically nothing outside of his wife's beauty)
he brought along with him to Egypt, Abraham was rich only in his dreams of
the future. Else - supposing, as we have no right to, that he had a
strength such as is not represented by worldly goods - why should he have
been afraid of Pharaoh? But there can be no misunderstanding the nature of
this little jaunt of Abraham's. It was only one of several such raids told
with cyni­cal politeness as to detail by the author of Genesis. There
probably were more raids which it was pointless to record. One thing is
certain: those visits were not motivated by friendliness. According to the
most reliable historians of that period the nomads wandered through many
countries, sometimes by pre-arrangement with those countries, but more
frequently in the spirit of sheer invasion. The historian of the
Encyclopaedia Brittanica says: "In times of draught and food-shortage such
nomads as these . . . were compelled to raid their agricultural, settled
neighbors." But in that first recorded trip to Egypt, Abraham, of whom the
ancient historian Nicolaus of Damascus wrote that he "came with an army
out of the land above Babylon" and "reigned at Damascus," was not yet
strong enough to enrich himself by violence. There are, however, more ways
than one of making conquest. The one chosen by Abraham, and resulting in
his being laden by Pharaoh with presents for the favors of his beautiful
wife, has become a very popular occupation. Apparently, also, few of the
tricks in the game as it is played today were unknown to Abraham. How else
are we to understand these words in Genesis: "The Lord plagued Pharaoh and
his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife." I cannot
accept the popular anti-Semitic interpretation that Abraham and his wife
suffered of a venereal disease. On the contrary I do not think anything
physical is implied here at all. Whenever he means to convey the idea of a
physical ailment the poet of Genesis is always at great pains to name it.
Here he merely says that the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house. Is it too
rash to assume that this plague sounds a little more like blackmail than
syphilis? Or why, if this is not true, is the poet at pains to explain
that when Abraham returned with his family out of Egypt he "was very rich
in cattle, in silver and in gold."

That Abraham, having discovered this new racket, decided to practice it
further, becomes apparent when he repeats the adventure in a similar
manner before the king of another people. "And Abraham journeyed from
thence toward the land of the South and dwelt between Kadesh and Gerar.
And Abraham said of Sarah and his wife: 'She is my sister. [4] And
Abimelech King of Gerar sent, and took Sarah. But God came to Abimelech in
a dream of the night, and said to him: 'Behold, thou shalt die, because of
the woman that thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife! Now Abimelech had
not come near her; and he said: 'Lord, wilt thou slay even a righteous
nation? Said he not himself unto me: she is my sister? and she, even
herself said: He is my brother. In the simplicity of my heart and the
innocency of my hands have I done this! And God said unto him in the
dream: 'Yea, I know that in the simplicity of thy heart hast thou done
this, and also witheld thee from sinning against Me. Therefore suffered I
thee not to touch her. Now therefore restore the man's wife; for he is a
prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt live; and if thou
restore her not, know that thou shalt surely die, thou, and all that are
thine.' And Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called all his
servants, and told them all these things in their ears; and the men were
sore afraid. Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him: 'What hast
thou done unto us? and wherein have I sinned against thee, that thou hast
brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds unto me
that ought not to be done! And Abimelech said unto Abraham: 'What sawest
thou that thou hast done this thing?' And Abraham said: 'Because I
thought: Surely the fear of God is not in this place: and they will slay
me for my wife's sake. And moreover, she is indeed my sister, the daughter
of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and so she became my
wife. And it came to pass when God caused me to wander from my father's
house, that I said unto her: 'This is thy kindness which thou shalt show
unto me; at every place whither we shall come, say of me: he is my
brother.' And Abimelech took sheep, and oxen, and men-servants and
women-servants, and gave them unto Abraham, and restored him Sarah his
wife. And Abimelech said: 'Behold, my land is before thee: dwell where it
pleaseth thee! And unto Sarah he said: 'Behold I have given thy brother a
thousand pieces of silver; behold, it is for thee a covering of the eyes
[5] to all who are with thee; and before all men thou art righted.' "

Abraham became a really rich man. There was too much for him to lose now
if having tried this little game, it should happen to fail. Besides,
having had the greater means, there were other grander schemes to work.
The story of Abraham becomes elo­quent with intrigues and alliances
between himself and other desert bandits and - God. He solemnly announces
his allegiance to a new Deity, and, probably to economize on the expensive
materials which went into the making of idols, and to save himself the
trouble of having to cart them about with him in the desert, he invented
God's in-corporeality. This carried him far into the esteem of his gaping
contemporaries. Only one thing seemed to trouble him: the lack of a son to
inherit the spoils and found a new nation in his name, as he had promised
himself in his dreams. Genesis reports that Abraham was not really very
particular. Finding himself too old to beget children of his own, Abraham
was quite content to let Ishmael, a son by his wife's servant Hagar, to be
his heir. If the passion of the narrative here is to be trusted, Abraham
was more than ordin­arily fond of Ishmael. But Sarah had never forgiven
Hagar for laugh­ing at her, and as she hated Hagar she loathed Hagar's
offspring. No, under no circumstances was that obnoxious handmaiden of
hers to fall heir to the name and riches of Abraham. Rather, since
Abraham was too old for the hope of a child by him, would it be a son of
her own by the seed of another man which might fructify within her [6].
Nothing is clearer in the book of Genesis than that Sarah was a shrew, and
that Abraham was a henpecked husband.

The stream of the narrative in Genesis is often turbulent and unclear
because it is really two narratives blended into one, with spots where the
process of blending was not so successfully accomplished. But the
unfolding of the strange circumstances leading to the birth of Isaac is
not the result of this difficulty. It must have been told quite honestly
by the author (or authors) of Genesis; but it was ob­viously tampered with
by those Hebrew scholars in Alexandria who committed most of the mischief
in Biblical exegesis. Here is the passage as it is given to us today:

"And the Lord appeared unto him (Abraham) by the terebinths of Mamre, as
he sat in the text door in the heat of the day; and he lifted his eyes and
looked, and lo, three men stood over against him; and when he saw them, he
ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed down to the earth, and
said: 'My LORD, if now I have found favor in thy sight, pass not away, I
pray thee, from thy servant. Let now a little water be fetched, and wash
your feet and recline yourself under the tree. And I will fetch a morsel
of bread, and stay ye your heart; after that ye shall pass on; forasmuch
as ye are come to your servant.' And they said: 'So do as thou hast said.'
And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said: 'Make ready
quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it and make cakes! And Abraham
ran unto the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it unto
the servant; and he hastened to dress it. And he took curd, and milk, and
the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them and he stood by them
under the tree, and they did eat. And they said unto him: 'Where is Sarah
thy wife?' And he said: 'Behold, in the tent,' And he said: 'I will
certainly return to thee when the season cometh round; and lo, Sarah thy
wife, shall have a son! And Sarah heard in the tent door, which was behind
him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old, and well stricken in age; it had
ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. And Sarah laughed
within herself, saying: 'After I have waxed old shall I have pleasure [7]
my lord being old also?' And the Lord said unto Abraham: 'Wherefore did
Sarah laugh, saying: Shall I of a surety bear a child, who am old? Is
anything too hard for the Lord? At the set time I will return unto thee '
when the, season cometh round, and Sarah shall have a son! Then Sarah
denied, saying: 'I laughed not,' for she was afraid. And He said: 'Nay but
thou didst laugh!"

Until the very last bantering words it is wildly possible that a story as
gravely beautiful, as poetically sincere as Genesis might have confused
humanity and divinity so badly. But would even the most rabid apologist
for Abraham and our national pride insist that the Lord carried on such
petty and utterly useless banter with the woman Sarah?

Notice that three people appear before Abraham. Three people are fed by
him, and fed "to stay the heart," an expression that would never have
occurred to the original author if he tried to convey the impression that
Abraham knew he was entertaining the Lord himself. But Abraham, you will
notice, carries on his conversation with only one. The expurgators of the
Bible who here did their best to veil the clear sense of the narrative,
would have you believe that the trio consisted of God and two of his
angels. Nothing concerning their nature is said or hinted in the first
part of the narrative here quoted. But in the next part, when, their
leader having remained behind to converse with Abraham, the two are
described entering the city of Sodom, the Alexandria meddlers seem to have
made up their minds, and those who are described as men in Chapter 18 are
definitely referred to as angels in Chapter 19. This inconsistency is made
plausible by the fact that the Hebrew word maluchim means both angels and
messengers.

Now to any intelligent unprejudiced reader it should become obvious from
the fact that Abraham greets three visitors and holds conversation with
only one, that the one was some important local chieftain, on his way to
prosecute an important business and that the two who accompanied him were
his bodyguards. To prove that these two were servants and not angels, it
is only necessary to prove that their master was a man, and not God. The
Hebrew text, so inexpertly tampered with, proves this conclusively. The
word Lord is written in two ways in Hebrew. When intended to denote the
Deity it is spelled Yahwah, and pronounced Adenoi. But when the word is
intended to denote a human master the word Adenoi is spelled as it is
pronounced. In that part of the narrative where I reproduced the word LORD
in capitals, the expurgators of Genesis - who faltered so frequently in
their mystifications - spelled the word Adenoi, as appertaining to a man.

Instead of being, what it has been made to appear, a meeting between
Abraham and God, the incident is merely that of a meeting between Abraham
and one of his more powerful neighbor chieftains. His message to Abraham
is in effect: Obviously, Abraham, you are not a man to trifle with. One
capable of inventing your particular monstrosity of a god, should be
consulted on all important desert matters. Well, I don't like the behavior
of the people in Sodom. I understand the lovemaking of man and woman
because it is sweet and fruitful. But what comes of the love of man and
man and woman and woman? Certainly nothing that can be seen by the naked
eye. And what a terrible example for our children. And what of the future
of the race? Their destruction which is certain should be hastened.
Towards that end I have sent my messengers ahead for a view of their
fortifications. Then we'll knock hell out of them. So much for our moral
chieftain's message. He began by accepting Abraham's hospitality, and,
with the insolence of the just, ended by proposing to provide him with an
heir.[8] It is to be presumed from the context that the beauty of Sarah
was as well known as Abraham's unfortu­nate lack of an heir; so that when
this chieftain saw the aged desert beauty winking at him from behind the
doorway it was only natural for him to become licentiously interested.

But are you not going a bit too far from the accepted reading of the
story, I can hear the reader ask. In proof of my belief that the incident
as I quote it from the Old Testament has been tampered with [9], and that
the story is really as I am setting it forth, I offer the corroboration of
Philo Judaeaus, the greatest Hebrew scholar of all time. Philo, who lived
about 10 B.C., must have had available the unaltered text of Genesis [10].
Here is his version of the matter:

"And when those persons, having been entertained in his house, address
their entertainer in an affectionate manner, it is again one of them who
promises that he will himself be present, and will bestow on him a seed of
a child of his own, speaking in the following words: 'I will return again
and visit thee again, according to the time of life, and Sarah thy wife
shall have a son.' "

Apparently the Old Testament's tamperers cut down his lordship's
proposed two visits to one, for it is only too obvious from the original,
as quoted by Philo, that the first visit, "according to the time of life"
was for the sowing of the seed, and the second, that he might see the seed
in flower.

But Abraham lived to bitterly regret this bargain. The account Genesis
gives us of Isaac, his indolence, his lack of pride and venturesomeness,
makes him, a pale ragged figure beside that of the flaming Ishmael. The
more Abraham looked at Isaac, the son of a stranger by his wife, the more
he loved Ishmael, sprung from his own loins. He grew to hate Isaac with a
terrible hatred, and it seems altogether likely to me that Abraham would
have thought of the sacrifice of Isaac even without divine intervention.

If Isaac died, Abraham decided, he would never again let Sarah inveigle
him into such an arrangement. And, whether Sarah liked it or not, Ishmael
would inherit everything. If my suggestion that Abraham really took Isaac
into the wilderness, when Sarah happened not to be aware, with the object
of murdering him, is not true, why was Abraham so secretive about his
operations! It could not be that he was performing a religious rite. All
other religious rites Abraham performed within sight of all his family and
servants.

The carelessness of our Hebrew fathers with regard to the chastity of
their wives passes on in the same deliberate tradition, to Isaac. When,
like his father, Isaac fell upon evil days, he wandered out with his
family into the land of the Philistines, the people ruled by Abimelech
whose affair with Isaac's mother had been so costly to the tribal
treasury. "And," records Genesis, "Isaac dwelt in Gerar. And the men of
the place asked him of his wife; and he said: 'She is my sister;' for he
feared to say: 'My wife, lest the men of the place should kill me for
Rebekah, because she is fair to look upon.' And it came to pass when he
had been there a long time, that Abim­elech king of the Philistines looked
out at a window, and saw, and, behold, Isaac was sporting with Rebekah his
wife. And Abimelech called Isaac and said: "Behold of a surety she is thy
wife, and how saidst thou: she is my sister?" And Isaac said unto him:
'Because I said: Lest I die because of her.' And Abimelech said: 'What is
this thou hast done unto us? One of the people might easily have lain with
thy wife, [11] and thou wouldst have brought guiltiness upon us.' And
Abimelech charged all the people saying: 'He that toucheth this man or his
wife shall surely be put to death.' And Isaac sowed in that land, and
found in the same year a hundredfold; and the Lord blessed him. And the
man waxed great, and grew more and more until he grew very great. And he
had possessions of flocks, and possessions of herds, and a great
household; and the Philistines envied him."

It must have been this propensity to trade the favors of their women for
gold that caused the Jews to be held in such abhorrence by the ancient
world. How deep-stung was this hatred of Jews in olden times is testified
to eloquently by the author of Genesis in his description of the feast set
by Joseph for his brethren: "And Joseph made haste; for his heart yearned
towards his brother; and he sought where to weep; and he entered into his
chamber and he wept there. And he washed his face, and came out; and he
refrained himself, and said: 'Set on bread.' And they set on for him by
himself, and for them by themselves; because the Egyptians might not eat
bread with the Hebrews; for that is an abomination for the Egyptians."

That is all. The subject matter is never again broached either in Genesis
or in the rest of the Old Testament. Why did not the author of Genesis,
who had such a deep respect for Egypt, make some effort to explain Egypt's
contempt for the Jews? He might at least have tried to explain why the
Egyptians at that table, all inferior to Joseph in rank, would have felt
it an abomination to eat with him? His complete indifference to the matter
is a more terrible accusation against the Jews than any to be found in the
works of Livy and Apion. But might there not have been some explanation
which was torn out of its context by the great expurgators?

The portrait of the third of the great founders of our blood is done in
even more lurid colors. Jacob - did not stop after stealing his brother
Esau's birthright: "And it came to pass," runs the story, "that when Isaac
was old, and his eyes were dim, so that he could not see, he called Esau
his elder son, and said unto him: 'My son;' and he said unto him: 'Here am
I' And he said: 'Behold, now, I am old, I know not the day of my death.
Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and
go out to the field, and take me venison; and make me savory food, such as
I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat; that my soul may bless me
before I die.' And Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And
Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it. And Rebekah
spoke unto Jacob her son, saying: 'behold, I heard thy father speak unto
Esau thy brother, saying: Bring me venison, and make me savory food, that
I may eat, and bless thee before the Lord before my death. Now therefore,
my son, hearken to my voice according to that which I command thee. Go now
to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I
will make them savory food for thy father, that he may eat, so that he may
bless thee before his death.' And Jacob said to Rebekah his mother:
'Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man. My father
peradventure will feel me, and I shall seem to him, as a mocker; and I
shall bring a curse upon me and not a blessing.' And his mother said unto
him: 'Upon me be thy curse, my son only hearken to my voice, and go fetch
me them.' And he went, and fetched, and brought them to his mother; and
his mother made savory food, such as his father loved. And Rebekah took
the choicest garments of Esau her eldest son, which were with her in the
house, and put them upon Jacob the young­er son. And she put the skins of
the kids of the goats upon his hands, and upon the smooth of his neck. And
she gave the savory food and the bread, which she had prepared, into the
hand of her son Jacob. And he came unto his father and said 'My father;'
and he said: 'Here am I; who art thou, my son?' And Jacob said unto his
father: 'I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou hast
badest me. Arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul
may bless me. 'And Isaac said unto his son: 'How is it that thou hast
found it so quickly, my son?' And he said: 'Because the Lord thy God sent
me good speed! And Isaac said unto Jacob: 'Come near I pray thee, that I
may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very son Esau or not.' And Jacob
went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt him, and said: 'The voice is
the voice of Jacob but the hands are the hands of Esau.' And he discerned
him not because his hands were hairy, as his brother Esau's hands, so he
blessed him. . . And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of
blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of
Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from the hunting. And he
also made savory food, and brought it unto his father; and he said unto
his father: 'Let my father arise and eat of his son's venison, that thy
soul may bless me.' And Isaac his father said unto him: 'Who art thou? And
he said: 'I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau! And Isaac trembled very
exceedingly, and said: 'Who, then, is he that hath taken venison, and
brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have
blessed him? Yea, and he shall be blessed! When Esau heard the words of
his father he cried with an exceeding great and bitter cry. . .' "

When the children, in the old little synagogue where I learnt my Hebrew
letters, came to this portion of the Law, the rabbi would add: "And the
cry which Esau uttered was so terrible that the fiery Gehannah itself
opened before him." The rabbi must have added this to frighten us, to give
us an inkling of what a monster out of Hell the man Esau was, so as to
make us loathe the hairy man. Instead, a thrill of sympathy shot through
me for the cheated Esau. In my heart, I must have loved him more than I
loved Jacob.

Only one thing relieves the portrait of Jacob, this man of monstrous
cunning and endless guile: his love for Rachel. The appearance of Rachel
introduces a new element into the story of the Hebrew race. Unlike the
wives of Abraham and Isaac, shrews of the shrillest order, Rachel was
beautiful and gentle. One can almost see her softening influence on the
character of her husband who combined business subtlety with a fierce
determination to rise even above the birthright he had purchased. The
delicate fingers of Rachel soften some of the hard lines in the portrait
of Jacob.

Top




[3] All Biblical quotations in this book are from the Jewish Publication
Society translation, accepted by the Jews as the most faithful to the
original Hebrew, obtainable in English.

[4] Even the bare pretense that this is done for fear of his life is
abandoned in the telling of the second adventure.

[5] 'Covering of the eyes' the oriental expression for 'hush-money.'

[6] A barren woman is a firm believer in her husband's barrenness.

[7] The issue is whether Abraham shall have an heir. But notice what the
old bitch is thinking about.

[8] The reader might object that Abraham could hardly believe that a son
would be his, if he were born of another man's seed. A modern Abraham
might not. But the ancient Hebrews had a peculiar attitude in such
matters. I refer you to verse 6, chapter 38 of Genesis: "And Judah took a
wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. And Er Judah's
firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the Lord: and the Lord slew him. And
Judah said unto Onan: 'Go in unto thy brother's wife, and perform the duty
of a husband's brother unto her, and raise up seed unto thy brother."' But
how, it may be asked, could the chieftain so glibly promise that the issue
would be a boy, and not a girl? The Arabians had a conceit about such
matters, and thought they knew by position in love how to predetermine the
sex of a child. Besides, an enamored man tries to be not accurate but
persuasive.

[9] The prevailing edition of Genesis has the Lord saying to Abraham that
his seed would be a stranger in a land not theirs and be afflicted for 400
years. In the version of Genesis available to Philo, the text read 40
years. Here, too, you see the hand of the expurgator attempting to connect
this prophesy with the Jews' eventual sojourn in Egypt.

[10] A similar accusation is made in the Koran. Several instances of vital
falsification are cited. But the Koran is a very poor critic of almost
everything else; and so I hesitate to cite it even where it is correct.

[11] What a compliment this is to Rebekah's virtue!



Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dr. Lippschitz
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:06 am    Post subject: Re: THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS Reply with quote

"TheZ" <TheZ@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:m5Ofk.18301$Ec.13522@read2.cgocable.net...
Quote:
I guess your father couldn't read Hebrew.

You can't even read English, schmuck.

We intelligent people know that the rabbis of Alexandria doctored all the
original scrolls. Most of them were also reconstructed from "memory" after
the Romans under Julius Caesar had to burn the library at Alexandria as a
diversion when trying to escape from the Egyptians.



Quote:

"Dr. Lippschitz" <lippschitz@skool.uni> wrote in message
news:SjNfk.28$0p1.12@trndny08...
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/09/jews-must-live-by-samuel-roth.html



Chapter II

THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS



The scrolls unroll before me. "In the beginning God created the heavens
and the earth. And the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was on
the face of the deep." The very first words I ever read. They are still
the most beautiful words I know. Baaraishes buroo Elohim as kashamayimm
vehu-uretz. Vehu-urtez hoysu sehoi uvohoi, vechoischach aal penai
tekoim." That is how the words actually sounded. I read on through the
unfolding scrolls, from the first word to the last, and the ancient
wonder stirs into music for me again. Good, deep, true lovely old book.
It tells a straightforward honest story. None of the illusions, following
which I almost broke my neck, are here. Only the rabbis lied to me.

The first time I heard the words, of the poet-author of Genesis it was
from the mouth of my father, and I revered him as if he were himself
their author. My father's father was a great man in the country in which
I was born: I heard him recite Hebrew words one Yom Kippur night, and he
wavered like a great god with wings between the two tall taper lights on
each side of the Ark of the Cove­nant. My father had three brothers, each
as tall and as stalwart as himself: occasionally Hebrew words would
emanate from them, and they appeared to grow into godhood in front of my
eyes. They are all dead now except one. I realized long before they died
that they were not gods. My father's father, his father before him, and
all the Jewish fathers yielding all the way back to Abraham the father of
them all - they were all Jews, far, far from gods.

No one knew this better than that wise poet-author of Genesis­ -- now
that I have learned how to read him correctly. "And there was a famine in
the land," he relates, "and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there:
for the famine was sore in the land. And it came to pass when he was come
near to enter into Egypt that he said unto Sarai, his wife: Behold now, I
know that thou art a fair woman to look upon. And it will come to pass
when the Egyptians will see thee, that they will say: 'This is his wife,'
and they will kill me, but thee they will keep alive. Say, I pray thee,
thou art my sister; that it may be well with me for thy sake, and that my
soul may live because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was
come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.
And the princes of Pharaoh saw her, and praised her to Pharaoh; and the
woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. And he dealt well with Abram for
her sake; and he had sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and men-servants and
maid-servants, and she-asses and camels. And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and
his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. And Pharaoh
called Abram and said: 'What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why
didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? Why saidst thou; She is my
sister? so that I took her to be my wife; now therefor behold thy wife,
take her, and go thy way! And Pharaoh gave men charge concerning him; and
they brought him on the way, and his wife, and all that they had. And
Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife and all that he had, and Lot
with him, into the South. And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver,
and in gold." [3]

Apparently these words describe one of the very early stages in the
career of this nomad chieftain to whom the blood of our race rolls back.
By the evidence of the little (practically nothing outside of his wife's
beauty) he brought along with him to Egypt, Abraham was rich only in his
dreams of the future. Else - supposing, as we have no right to, that he
had a strength such as is not represented by worldly goods - why should
he have been afraid of Pharaoh? But there can be no misunderstanding the
nature of this little jaunt of Abraham's. It was only one of several such
raids told with cyni­cal politeness as to detail by the author of
Genesis. There probably were more raids which it was pointless to record.
One thing is certain: those visits were not motivated by friendliness.
According to the most reliable historians of that period the nomads
wandered through many countries, sometimes by pre-arrangement with those
countries, but more frequently in the spirit of sheer invasion. The
historian of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica says: "In times of draught and
food-shortage such nomads as these . . . were compelled to raid their
agricultural, settled neighbors." But in that first recorded trip to
Egypt, Abraham, of whom the ancient historian Nicolaus of Damascus wrote
that he "came with an army out of the land above Babylon" and "reigned at
Damascus," was not yet strong enough to enrich himself by violence. There
are, however, more ways than one of making conquest. The one chosen by
Abraham, and resulting in his being laden by Pharaoh with presents for
the favors of his beautiful wife, has become a very popular occupation.
Apparently, also, few of the tricks in the game as it is played today
were unknown to Abraham. How else are we to understand these words in
Genesis: "The Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues
because of Sarai Abram's wife." I cannot accept the popular anti-Semitic
interpretation that Abraham and his wife suffered of a venereal disease.
On the contrary I do not think anything physical is implied here at all.
Whenever he means to convey the idea of a physical ailment the poet of
Genesis is always at great pains to name it. Here he merely says that the
Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house. Is it too rash to assume that this
plague sounds a little more like blackmail than syphilis? Or why, if this
is not true, is the poet at pains to explain that when Abraham returned
with his family out of Egypt he "was very rich in cattle, in silver and
in gold."

That Abraham, having discovered this new racket, decided to practice it
further, becomes apparent when he repeats the adventure in a similar
manner before the king of another people. "And Abraham journeyed from
thence toward the land of the South and dwelt between Kadesh and Gerar.
And Abraham said of Sarah and his wife: 'She is my sister. [4] And
Abimelech King of Gerar sent, and took Sarah. But God came to Abimelech
in a dream of the night, and said to him: 'Behold, thou shalt die,
because of the woman that thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife! Now
Abimelech had not come near her; and he said: 'Lord, wilt thou slay even
a righteous nation? Said he not himself unto me: she is my sister? and
she, even herself said: He is my brother. In the simplicity of my heart
and the innocency of my hands have I done this! And God said unto him in
the dream: 'Yea, I know that in the simplicity of thy heart hast thou
done this, and also witheld thee from sinning against Me. Therefore
suffered I thee not to touch her. Now therefore restore the man's wife;
for he is a prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt live; and
if thou restore her not, know that thou shalt surely die, thou, and all
that are thine.' And Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called all
his servants, and told them all these things in their ears; and the men
were sore afraid. Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him: 'What
hast thou done unto us? and wherein have I sinned against thee, that thou
hast brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds
unto me that ought not to be done! And Abimelech said unto Abraham: 'What
sawest thou that thou hast done this thing?' And Abraham said: 'Because I
thought: Surely the fear of God is not in this place: and they will slay
me for my wife's sake. And moreover, she is indeed my sister, the
daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and so she
became my wife. And it came to pass when God caused me to wander from my
father's house, that I said unto her: 'This is thy kindness which thou
shalt show unto me; at every place whither we shall come, say of me: he
is my brother.' And Abimelech took sheep, and oxen, and men-servants and
women-servants, and gave them unto Abraham, and restored him Sarah his
wife. And Abimelech said: 'Behold, my land is before thee: dwell where it
pleaseth thee! And unto Sarah he said: 'Behold I have given thy brother a
thousand pieces of silver; behold, it is for thee a covering of the eyes
[5] to all who are with thee; and before all men thou art righted.' "

Abraham became a really rich man. There was too much for him to lose now
if having tried this little game, it should happen to fail. Besides,
having had the greater means, there were other grander schemes to work.
The story of Abraham becomes elo­quent with intrigues and alliances
between himself and other desert bandits and - God. He solemnly announces
his allegiance to a new Deity, and, probably to economize on the
expensive materials which went into the making of idols, and to save
himself the trouble of having to cart them about with him in the desert,
he invented God's in-corporeality. This carried him far into the esteem
of his gaping contemporaries. Only one thing seemed to trouble him: the
lack of a son to inherit the spoils and found a new nation in his name,
as he had promised himself in his dreams. Genesis reports that Abraham
was not really very particular. Finding himself too old to beget children
of his own, Abraham was quite content to let Ishmael, a son by his wife's
servant Hagar, to be his heir. If the passion of the narrative here is to
be trusted, Abraham was more than ordin­arily fond of Ishmael. But Sarah
had never forgiven Hagar for laugh­ing at her, and as she hated Hagar she
loathed Hagar's offspring. No, under no circumstances was that obnoxious
handmaiden of hers to fall heir to the name and riches of Abraham.
Rather, since Abraham was too old for the hope of a child by him, would
it be a son of her own by the seed of another man which might fructify
within her [6]. Nothing is clearer in the book of Genesis than that Sarah
was a shrew, and that Abraham was a henpecked husband.

The stream of the narrative in Genesis is often turbulent and unclear
because it is really two narratives blended into one, with spots where
the process of blending was not so successfully accomplished. But the
unfolding of the strange circumstances leading to the birth of Isaac is
not the result of this difficulty. It must have been told quite honestly
by the author (or authors) of Genesis; but it was ob­viously tampered
with by those Hebrew scholars in Alexandria who committed most of the
mischief in Biblical exegesis. Here is the passage as it is given to us
today:

"And the Lord appeared unto him (Abraham) by the terebinths of Mamre, as
he sat in the text door in the heat of the day; and he lifted his eyes
and looked, and lo, three men stood over against him; and when he saw
them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed down to the
earth, and said: 'My LORD, if now I have found favor in thy sight, pass
not away, I pray thee, from thy servant. Let now a little water be
fetched, and wash your feet and recline yourself under the tree. And I
will fetch a morsel of bread, and stay ye your heart; after that ye shall
pass on; forasmuch as ye are come to your servant.' And they said: 'So do
as thou hast said.' And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and
said: 'Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it and make
cakes! And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good,
and gave it unto the servant; and he hastened to dress it. And he took
curd, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them
and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat. And they said unto
him: 'Where is Sarah thy wife?' And he said: 'Behold, in the tent,' And
he said: 'I will certainly return to thee when the season cometh round;
and lo, Sarah thy wife, shall have a son! And Sarah heard in the tent
door, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old, and well
stricken in age; it had ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of
women. And Sarah laughed within herself, saying: 'After I have waxed old
shall I have pleasure [7] my lord being old also?' And the Lord said unto
Abraham: 'Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying: Shall I of a surety bear a
child, who am old? Is anything too hard for the Lord? At the set time I
will return unto thee ' when the, season cometh round, and Sarah shall
have a son! Then Sarah denied, saying: 'I laughed not,' for she was
afraid. And He said: 'Nay but thou didst laugh!"

Until the very last bantering words it is wildly possible that a story as
gravely beautiful, as poetically sincere as Genesis might have confused
humanity and divinity so badly. But would even the most rabid apologist
for Abraham and our national pride insist that the Lord carried on such
petty and utterly useless banter with the woman Sarah?

Notice that three people appear before Abraham. Three people are fed by
him, and fed "to stay the heart," an expression that would never have
occurred to the original author if he tried to convey the impression that
Abraham knew he was entertaining the Lord himself. But Abraham, you will
notice, carries on his conversation with only one. The expurgators of the
Bible who here did their best to veil the clear sense of the narrative,
would have you believe that the trio consisted of God and two of his
angels. Nothing concerning their nature is said or hinted in the first
part of the narrative here quoted. But in the next part, when, their
leader having remained behind to converse with Abraham, the two are
described entering the city of Sodom, the Alexandria meddlers seem to
have made up their minds, and those who are described as men in Chapter
18 are definitely referred to as angels in Chapter 19. This inconsistency
is made plausible by the fact that the Hebrew word maluchim means both
angels and messengers.

Now to any intelligent unprejudiced reader it should become obvious from
the fact that Abraham greets three visitors and holds conversation with
only one, that the one was some important local chieftain, on his way to
prosecute an important business and that the two who accompanied him were
his bodyguards. To prove that these two were servants and not angels, it
is only necessary to prove that their master was a man, and not God. The
Hebrew text, so inexpertly tampered with, proves this conclusively. The
word Lord is written in two ways in Hebrew. When intended to denote the
Deity it is spelled Yahwah, and pronounced Adenoi. But when the word is
intended to denote a human master the word Adenoi is spelled as it is
pronounced. In that part of the narrative where I reproduced the word
LORD in capitals, the expurgators of Genesis - who faltered so frequently
in their mystifications - spelled the word Adenoi, as appertaining to a
man.

Instead of being, what it has been made to appear, a meeting between
Abraham and God, the incident is merely that of a meeting between Abraham
and one of his more powerful neighbor chieftains. His message to Abraham
is in effect: Obviously, Abraham, you are not a man to trifle with. One
capable of inventing your particular monstrosity of a god, should be
consulted on all important desert matters. Well, I don't like the
behavior of the people in Sodom. I understand the lovemaking of man and
woman because it is sweet and fruitful. But what comes of the love of man
and man and woman and woman? Certainly nothing that can be seen by the
naked eye. And what a terrible example for our children. And what of the
future of the race? Their destruction which is certain should be
hastened. Towards that end I have sent my messengers ahead for a view of
their fortifications. Then we'll knock hell out of them. So much for our
moral chieftain's message. He began by accepting Abraham's hospitality,
and, with the insolence of the just, ended by proposing to provide him
with an heir.[8] It is to be presumed from the context that the beauty of
Sarah was as well known as Abraham's unfortu­nate lack of an heir; so
that when this chieftain saw the aged desert beauty winking at him from
behind the doorway it was only natural for him to become licentiously
interested.

But are you not going a bit too far from the accepted reading of the
story, I can hear the reader ask. In proof of my belief that the incident
as I quote it from the Old Testament has been tampered with [9], and that
the story is really as I am setting it forth, I offer the corroboration
of Philo Judaeaus, the greatest Hebrew scholar of all time. Philo, who
lived about 10 B.C., must have had available the unaltered text of
Genesis [10]. Here is his version of the matter:

"And when those persons, having been entertained in his house, address
their entertainer in an affectionate manner, it is again one of them who
promises that he will himself be present, and will bestow on him a seed
of a child of his own, speaking in the following words: 'I will return
again and visit thee again, according to the time of life, and Sarah thy
wife shall have a son.' "

Apparently the Old Testament's tamperers cut down his lordship's
proposed two visits to one, for it is only too obvious from the original,
as quoted by Philo, that the first visit, "according to the time of life"
was for the sowing of the seed, and the second, that he might see the
seed in flower.

But Abraham lived to bitterly regret this bargain. The account Genesis
gives us of Isaac, his indolence, his lack of pride and venturesomeness,
makes him, a pale ragged figure beside that of the flaming Ishmael. The
more Abraham looked at Isaac, the son of a stranger by his wife, the more
he loved Ishmael, sprung from his own loins. He grew to hate Isaac with a
terrible hatred, and it seems altogether likely to me that Abraham would
have thought of the sacrifice of Isaac even without divine intervention.

If Isaac died, Abraham decided, he would never again let Sarah inveigle
him into such an arrangement. And, whether Sarah liked it or not, Ishmael
would inherit everything. If my suggestion that Abraham really took Isaac
into the wilderness, when Sarah happened not to be aware, with the object
of murdering him, is not true, why was Abraham so secretive about his
operations! It could not be that he was performing a religious rite. All
other religious rites Abraham performed within sight of all his family
and servants.

The carelessness of our Hebrew fathers with regard to the chastity of
their wives passes on in the same deliberate tradition, to Isaac. When,
like his father, Isaac fell upon evil days, he wandered out with his
family into the land of the Philistines, the people ruled by Abimelech
whose affair with Isaac's mother had been so costly to the tribal
treasury. "And," records Genesis, "Isaac dwelt in Gerar. And the men of
the place asked him of his wife; and he said: 'She is my sister;' for he
feared to say: 'My wife, lest the men of the place should kill me for
Rebekah, because she is fair to look upon.' And it came to pass when he
had been there a long time, that Abim­elech king of the Philistines
looked out at a window, and saw, and, behold, Isaac was sporting with
Rebekah his wife. And Abimelech called Isaac and said: "Behold of a
surety she is thy wife, and how saidst thou: she is my sister?" And Isaac
said unto him: 'Because I said: Lest I die because of her.' And Abimelech
said: 'What is this thou hast done unto us? One of the people might
easily have lain with thy wife, [11] and thou wouldst have brought
guiltiness upon us.' And Abimelech charged all the people saying: 'He
that toucheth this man or his wife shall surely be put to death.' And
Isaac sowed in that land, and found in the same year a hundredfold; and
the Lord blessed him. And the man waxed great, and grew more and more
until he grew very great. And he had possessions of flocks, and
possessions of herds, and a great household; and the Philistines envied
him."

It must have been this propensity to trade the favors of their women for
gold that caused the Jews to be held in such abhorrence by the ancient
world. How deep-stung was this hatred of Jews in olden times is testified
to eloquently by the author of Genesis in his description of the feast
set by Joseph for his brethren: "And Joseph made haste; for his heart
yearned towards his brother; and he sought where to weep; and he entered
into his chamber and he wept there. And he washed his face, and came out;
and he refrained himself, and said: 'Set on bread.' And they set on for
him by himself, and for them by themselves; because the Egyptians might
not eat bread with the Hebrews; for that is an abomination for the
Egyptians."

That is all. The subject matter is never again broached either in Genesis
or in the rest of the Old Testament. Why did not the author of Genesis,
who had such a deep respect for Egypt, make some effort to explain
Egypt's contempt for the Jews? He might at least have tried to explain
why the Egyptians at that table, all inferior to Joseph in rank, would
have felt it an abomination to eat with him? His complete indifference to
the matter is a more terrible accusation against the Jews than any to be
found in the works of Livy and Apion. But might there not have been some
explanation which was torn out of its context by the great expurgators?

The portrait of the third of the great founders of our blood is done in
even more lurid colors. Jacob - did not stop after stealing his brother
Esau's birthright: "And it came to pass," runs the story, "that when
Isaac was old, and his eyes were dim, so that he could not see, he called
Esau his elder son, and said unto him: 'My son;' and he said unto him:
'Here am I' And he said: 'Behold, now, I am old, I know not the day of my
death. Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy
bow, and go out to the field, and take me venison; and make me savory
food, such as I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat; that my soul
may bless me before I die.' And Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau
his son. And Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it.
And Rebekah spoke unto Jacob her son, saying: 'behold, I heard thy father
speak unto Esau thy brother, saying: Bring me venison, and make me savory
food, that I may eat, and bless thee before the Lord before my death. Now
therefore, my son, hearken to my voice according to that which I command
thee. Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the
goats; and I will make them savory food for thy father, that he may eat,
so that he may bless thee before his death.' And Jacob said to Rebekah
his mother: 'Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man, and I am a smooth
man. My father peradventure will feel me, and I shall seem to him, as a
mocker; and I shall bring a curse upon me and not a blessing.' And his
mother said unto him: 'Upon me be thy curse, my son only hearken to my
voice, and go fetch me them.' And he went, and fetched, and brought them
to his mother; and his mother made savory food, such as his father loved.
And Rebekah took the choicest garments of Esau her eldest son, which were
with her in the house, and put them upon Jacob the young­er son. And she
put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands, and upon the
smooth of his neck. And she gave the savory food and the bread, which she
had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob. And he came unto his father
and said 'My father;' and he said: 'Here am I; who art thou, my son?' And
Jacob said unto his father: 'I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done
according as thou hast badest me. Arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my
venison, that thy soul may bless me. 'And Isaac said unto his son: 'How
is it that thou hast found it so quickly, my son?' And he said: 'Because
the Lord thy God sent me good speed! And Isaac said unto Jacob: 'Come
near I pray thee, that I may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very
son Esau or not.' And Jacob went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt
him, and said: 'The voice is the voice of Jacob but the hands are the
hands of Esau.' And he discerned him not because his hands were hairy, as
his brother Esau's hands, so he blessed him. . . And it came to pass, as
soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce
gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother
came in from the hunting. And he also made savory food, and brought it
unto his father; and he said unto his father: 'Let my father arise and
eat of his son's venison, that thy soul may bless me.' And Isaac his
father said unto him: 'Who art thou? And he said: 'I am thy son, thy
firstborn Esau! And Isaac trembled very exceedingly, and said: 'Who,
then, is he that hath taken venison, and brought it me, and I have eaten
of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? Yea, and he shall be
blessed! When Esau heard the words of his father he cried with an
exceeding great and bitter cry. . .' "

When the children, in the old little synagogue where I learnt my Hebrew
letters, came to this portion of the Law, the rabbi would add: "And the
cry which Esau uttered was so terrible that the fiery Gehannah itself
opened before him." The rabbi must have added this to frighten us, to
give us an inkling of what a monster out of Hell the man Esau was, so as
to make us loathe the hairy man. Instead, a thrill of sympathy shot
through me for the cheated Esau. In my heart, I must have loved him more
than I loved Jacob.

Only one thing relieves the portrait of Jacob, this man of monstrous
cunning and endless guile: his love for Rachel. The appearance of Rachel
introduces a new element into the story of the Hebrew race. Unlike the
wives of Abraham and Isaac, shrews of the shrillest order, Rachel was
beautiful and gentle. One can almost see her softening influence on the
character of her husband who combined business subtlety with a fierce
determination to rise even above the birthright he had purchased. The
delicate fingers of Rachel soften some of the hard lines in the portrait
of Jacob.

Top




[3] All Biblical quotations in this book are from the Jewish Publication
Society translation, accepted by the Jews as the most faithful to the
original Hebrew, obtainable in English.

[4] Even the bare pretense that this is done for fear of his life is
abandoned in the telling of the second adventure.

[5] 'Covering of the eyes' the oriental expression for 'hush-money.'

[6] A barren woman is a firm believer in her husband's barrenness.

[7] The issue is whether Abraham shall have an heir. But notice what the
old bitch is thinking about.

[8] The reader might object that Abraham could hardly believe that a son
would be his, if he were born of another man's seed. A modern Abraham
might not. But the ancient Hebrews had a peculiar attitude in such
matters. I refer you to verse 6, chapter 38 of Genesis: "And Judah took a
wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. And Er Judah's
firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the Lord: and the Lord slew him.
And Judah said unto Onan: 'Go in unto thy brother's wife, and perform the
duty of a husband's brother unto her, and raise up seed unto thy
brother."' But how, it may be asked, could the chieftain so glibly
promise that the issue would be a boy, and not a girl? The Arabians had a
conceit about such matters, and thought they knew by position in love how
to predetermine the sex of a child. Besides, an enamored man tries to be
not accurate but persuasive.

[9] The prevailing edition of Genesis has the Lord saying to Abraham that
his seed would be a stranger in a land not theirs and be afflicted for
400 years. In the version of Genesis available to Philo, the text read 40
years. Here, too, you see the hand of the expurgator attempting to
connect this prophesy with the Jews' eventual sojourn in Egypt.

[10] A similar accusation is made in the Koran. Several instances of
vital falsification are cited. But the Koran is a very poor critic of
almost everything else; and so I hesitate to cite it even where it is
correct.

[11] What a compliment this is to Rebekah's virtue!





Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dr. Lippschitz
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:12 am    Post subject: Re: THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS Reply with quote

"TheZ" <TheZ@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:m5Ofk.18301$Ec.13522@read2.cgocable.net...
Quote:
I guess your father couldn't read Hebrew.

I don't know hebrew too well but here's something you people from the east
will understand.

???? ??????? ????? ??????



Quote:

"Dr. Lippschitz" <lippschitz@skool.uni> wrote in message
news:SjNfk.28$0p1.12@trndny08...
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/09/jews-must-live-by-samuel-roth.html



Chapter II

THE JEW-HATRED OF GENESIS



The scrolls unroll before me. "In the beginning God created the heavens
and the earth. And the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was on
the face of the deep." The very first words I ever read. They are still
the most beautiful words I know. Baaraishes buroo Elohim as kashamayimm
vehu-uretz. Vehu-urtez hoysu sehoi uvohoi, vechoischach aal penai
tekoim." That is how the words actually sounded. I read on through the
unfolding scrolls, from the first word to the last, and the ancient
wonder stirs into music for me again. Good, deep, true lovely old book.
It tells a straightforward honest story. None of the illusions, following
which I almost broke my neck, are here. Only the rabbis lied to me.

The first time I heard the words, of the poet-author of Genesis it was
from the mouth of my father, and I revered him as if he were himself
their author. My father's father was a great man in the country in which
I was born: I heard him recite Hebrew words one Yom Kippur night, and he
wavered like a great god with wings between the two tall taper lights on
each side of the Ark of the Cove­nant. My father had three brothers, each
as tall and as stalwart as himself: occasionally Hebrew words would
emanate from them, and they appeared to grow into godhood in front of my
eyes. They are all dead now except one. I realized long before they died
that they were not gods. My father's father, his father before him, and
all the Jewish fathers yielding all the way back to Abraham the father of
them all - they were all Jews, far, far from gods.

No one knew this better than that wise poet-author of Genesis­ -- now
that I have learned how to read him correctly. "And there was a famine in
the land," he relates, "and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there:
for the famine was sore in the land. And it came to pass when he was come
near to enter into Egypt that he said unto Sarai, his wife: Behold now, I
know that thou art a fair woman to look upon. And it will come to pass
when the Egyptians will see thee, that they will say: 'This is his wife,'
and they will kill me, but thee they will keep alive. Say, I pray thee,
thou art my sister; that it may be well with me for thy sake, and that my
soul may live because of thee. And it came to pass, that, when Abram was
come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.
And the princes of Pharaoh saw her, and praised her to Pharaoh; and the
woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. And he dealt well with Abram for
her sake; and he had sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and men-servants and
maid-servants, and she-asses and camels. And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and
his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. And Pharaoh
called Abram and said: 'What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why
didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? Why saidst thou; She is my
sister? so that I took her to be my wife; now therefor behold thy wife,
take her, and go thy way! And Pharaoh gave men charge concerning him; and
they brought him on the way, and his wife, and all that they had. And
Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife and all that he had, and Lot
with him, into the South. And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver,
and in gold." [3]

Apparently these words describe one of the very early stages in the
career of this nomad chieftain to whom the blood of our race rolls back.
By the evidence of the little (practically nothing outside of his wife's
beauty) he brought along with him to Egypt, Abraham was rich only in his
dreams of the future. Else - supposing, as we have no right to, that he
had a strength such as is not represented by worldly goods - why should
he have been afraid of Pharaoh? But there can be no misunderstanding the
nature of this little jaunt of Abraham's. It was only one of several such
raids told with cyni­cal politeness as to detail by the author of
Genesis. There probably were more raids which it was pointless to record.
One thing is certain: those visits were not motivated by friendliness.
According to the most reliable historians of that period the nomads
wandered through many countries, sometimes by pre-arrangement with those
countries, but more frequently in the spirit of sheer invasion. The
historian of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica says: "In times of draught and
food-shortage such nomads as these . . . were compelled to raid their
agricultural, settled neighbors." But in that first recorded trip to
Egypt, Abraham, of whom the ancient historian Nicolaus of Damascus wrote
that he "came with an army out of the land above Babylon" and "reigned at
Damascus," was not yet strong enough to enrich himself by violence. There
are, however, more ways than one of making conquest. The one chosen by
Abraham, and resulting in his being laden by Pharaoh with presents for
the favors of his beautiful wife, has become a very popular occupation.
Apparently, also, few of the tricks in the game as it is played today
were unknown to Abraham. How else are we to understand these words in
Genesis: "The Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues
because of Sarai Abram's wife." I cannot accept the popular anti-Semitic
interpretation that Abraham and his wife suffered of a venereal disease.
On the contrary I do not think anything physical is implied here at all.
Whenever he means to convey the idea of a physical ailment the poet of
Genesis is always at great pains to name it. Here he merely says that the
Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house. Is it too rash to assume that this
plague sounds a little more like blackmail than syphilis? Or why, if this
is not true, is the poet at pains to explain that when Abraham returned
with his family out of Egypt he "was very rich in cattle, in silver and
in gold."

That Abraham, having discovered this new racket, decided to practice it
further, becomes apparent when he repeats the adventure in a similar
manner before the king of another people. "And Abraham journeyed from
thence toward the land of the South and dwelt between Kadesh and Gerar.
And Abraham said of Sarah and his wife: 'She is my sister. [4] And
Abimelech King of Gerar sent, and took Sarah. But God came to Abimelech
in a dream of the night, and said to him: 'Behold, thou shalt die,
because of the woman that thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife! Now
Abimelech had not come near her; and he said: 'Lord, wilt thou slay even
a righteous nation? Said he not himself unto me: she is my sister? and
she, even herself said: He is my brother. In the simplicity of my heart
and the innocency of my hands have I done this! And God said unto him in
the dream: 'Yea, I know that in the simplicity of thy heart hast thou
done this, and also witheld thee from sinning against Me. Therefore
suffered I thee not to touch her. Now therefore restore the man's wife;
for he is a prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt live; and
if thou restore her not, know that thou shalt surely die, thou, and all
that are thine.' And Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called all
his servants, and told them all these things in their ears; and the men
were sore afraid. Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him: 'What
hast thou done unto us? and wherein have I sinned against thee, that thou
hast brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds
unto me that ought not to be done! And Abimelech said unto Abraham: 'What
sawest thou that thou hast done this thing?' And Abraham said: 'Because I
thought: Surely the fear of God is not in this place: and they will slay
me for my wife's sake. And moreover, she is indeed my sister, the
daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and so she
became my wife. And it came to pass when God caused me to wander from my
father's house, that I said unto her: 'This is thy kindness which thou
shalt show unto me; at every place whither we shall come, say of me: he
is my brother.' And Abimelech took sheep, and oxen, and men-servants and
women-servants, and gave them unto Abraham, and restored him Sarah his
wife. And Abimelech said: 'Behold, my land is before thee: dwell where it
pleaseth thee! And unto Sarah he said: 'Behold I have given thy brother a
thousand p